Tuesday, January 13, 2009

Are These the Lies or the Statistics?

John Mauldin has more on the details and the real facts behind last Friday's awful jobs report from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. He says that these facts are in the BLS report and not not hidden, if someone just takes the time to look for them. He also states that the deceptiveness of the headline numbers are not due to conspiracy, but just the methodology that tends to understate the gravity of unemployment during times of economic trauma.

He has posted it under the heading, "Lies, Damned Lies, and Government Unemployment Numbers":

There are some who see a ray of hope in the recent jobless claims reports, which have dropped back to “only” 467,000 in initial unemployment claims, down from 491,000 for the last week, after being over 500,000 for several weeks. Those numbers are seasonally adjusted. That hope disappears if you look at the actual numbers. For the current reporting week ending January 3, 2009, the advance number of initial claims came in at 726,420. Last week’s advance number was 717,000. We have been above 600,000 new initial claims every week since the third week of November. Continuing claims jumped massively, by 744,000 to 5,316,124...

In December, the number of unemployed persons increased by a seasonally adjusted 632,000 to 11.1 million and the unemployment rate rose to 7.2%. Since the start of the recession in December 2007, the number of unemployed persons has grown by 3.6 million, and the unemployment rate has risen by 2.3% and is now at 7.2%.

I happened to be watching CNBC at the time of the release of the data, and several commentators remarked how much better the number was than they thought it would be. I wish they were right, but again, the actual numbers showed a loss of 954,000 jobs, over 50% more than the headline number reported in the press release. And that assumes that new businesses created 72,000 jobs from the birth/death model that I so frequently write about. It is possible that almost 1 million jobs were lost in December. I doubt the market would have liked that number.

I should note that the Bureau of Labor Statistics does not hide that number. You can find it if you dig for it. But most analysts seem to prefer just to take the press release and go with it. And most of the time that is fine. But in times like this, when trends are changing, you miss the bigger picture and get misleading data...

If you add people who have part-time jobs but would like a full-time job, and what are called marginally attached workers, the current rate is already 13.5%.

Even Mauldin's figures don't state the full total in a single figure. If we add the number of reported jobs losses and the assumed jobs created that weren't really created, the total jobs lost in December were:

1,026,000 jobs lost -- and that's one month!

Here is the entire newsletter.