by John Aziz of Azizonomics
Expansionary monetary policy constitutes a transfer of purchasing
power away from those who hold old money to whoever gets new money. This
is known as the Cantillon Effect, after 18th Century economist Richard
Cantillon who first proposed it. In the immediate term, as more dollars
are created, each one translates to a smaller slice of all goods and
services produced.
How we measure this phenomenon and its size depends how we define money. This is illustrated below.
Here’s GDP expressed in terms of the monetary base:
Here’s GDP expressed in terms of M2:
And here’s GDP expressed in terms of total debt:
What is clear is that the dramatic expansion of the monetary base
that we saw after 2008 is merely catching up with the more gradual
growth of debt that took place in the 90s and 00s.
While it is my hunch
that overblown credit bubbles are better liquidated than reflated (not
least because the reflation of a corrupt and dysfunctional financial
sector entails huge moral hazard), it is true the Fed’s efforts to
inflate the money supply have so far prevented a default cascade. We should expect that such initiatives will continue, not least because Bernanke has a deep intellectual investment in reflationism.
This focus on reflationary money supply expansion was fully expected
by those familiar with Ben Bernanke’s academic record. What I find more
surprising, though, is the Fed’s focus on banks and financial
institutions rather than the wider population.
It’s not just the banks that are struggling to deleverage. The
overwhelming majority of nongovernment debt is held by households and
nonfinancials:
The nonfinancial sectors need debt relief much, much more than the
financial sector. Yet the Fed shoots off new money solely into the
financial system, to Wall Street and the TBTF banks. It is the financial
institutions that have gained the most from these transfers of
purchasing power, building up huge hoards of excess reserves:
There is a way to counteract the Cantillon Effect, and expand the
money supply without transferring purchasing power to the financial
sector (or any other sector). This is to directly distribute the new
money uniformly to individuals for the purpose of debt relief; those
with debt have to use the new money to pay it down (thus reducing the
debt load), those without debt are free to invest it or spend it as they
like.