Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Gold Edges to New High Despite Some Relief in Europe

The sovereign debt issues are not going away. They will only intensify! Morgan Stanley recently predicted that there will be a sovereign that will default on its debt. The only questions are who and when.

HONG KONG (MarketWatch) -- Gold for December delivery touched a high of $1,262.30 an ounce in electronic trading on Globex by late Wednesday afternoon in Asia. That's a more than two-month high for the December 2010 contract, though it tops the record settlement price of $1,259.30 for a widely-traded contract reached at the close of New York trading Tuesday. The contract was last up $2 at $1,261.30. "With European debt concerns set to intensify, we expect further investment diversification to propel the metals [gold and silver] to fresh highs," James Moore, an analyst at TheBullionDesk.com in London, said in a report Wednesday.

Tuesday, September 7, 2010

Hedge Fund Redemptions May Force Liquidations

First mutual funds, then ETFs, now Hedge Funds. Bloomberg reports that the smartest of the smart money have posted an outflow of $2.9 billion in July, or 0.2% of total assets: the most since January, based on TrimTabs research. "July's number follows an outflow of $2.7 billion in June. The industry has dropped 4 percent since April 2010, according to Trimtabs, which attributed the decline mostly to negative returns in May and June. Flows have now been negative five of the last eight months (see chart, this page), the worst eight-month stretch since the September 2008 to April 2009 period." And for those wondering why hedge funds are counting down each of the remaining 17 trading days with increasing dread, is the following reason from TrimTabs: "Redemptions should resume in September; historically one of the worst months for hedge fund flows. For the year, flows toward hedge funds stand at $1 billion, following redemptions of $172 billion in 2009 and $150 billion in 2008. We believe it is safe to assume this “lost” $320 billion will not come back to the industry any time soon." As is now well known, the July rally was broadly missed by hedge funds which are now underperforming the general market according to the Bloomberg BAIF Hedge Fund Index. The only open question is how many managed to lever into the rally of the first week of September and pull the cord at the very top.

Trimtabs said that hedge funds appear to have missed out on market gains in the S&P 500 Index during July because of conservative positions. The S&P 500 surged 6.9 percent during the month, while hedge funds gained only 1.93 percent. A survey by Trimtabs shows hedge fund managers remain bearish on equities. That may reflect the deteriorating economic landscape and the reluctance of hedge funds to take on risk having only recently recovered many of the losses that occurred in 2008.
It also appears that the hedge fund industry is not at all immune from the same size-scaling issues prevalent everywhere else in finance:
The industry continues to show signs of consolidation. The funds with more than $5 billion in assets have recorded net inflows of $7.7 billion this year, while funds with less than $200 million have seen net losses of $18.3 billion, equivalent to 15.7 percent of assets.
Yet the most damning piece of data is the simplest one: the performance of the hedge fund universe as a whole, which is not only negative YTD, meaning most highwater marks are in major danger of not getting surpassed, but that hedge funds are broadly underperforming the S&P itself, which infuriates LPs more than charges of child porn, embezzlement, and felony theft leveled as the portfolio manager.

(Global Hedge Fund Returns per Bloomberg)
Another observation which validates what we have been saying is that Long-Short strategies are among the worst performers of the year, losing 4.09% YTD, as record implied correlations make traditional hedging impossible. The best strategies of the year: Mortgage-backed arbitrage, Convertible Arbitrage, and Asset backed arbitrage.

There are 17 trading days left in September, and the hedge fund community will be dreading each and every one of them, keeping a close eye on the fax machine and the hated redemption notice by end of trading on September 30.

Meredith Whitney: Wall Street to Cut 80,000 Jobs!

Securities firms around the world will cut as many as 80,000 jobs in the next 18 months as revenue growth begins to slow, said Meredith Whitney, the former Oppenheimer & Co. analyst who now runs her own firm.
The reductions, about 10 percent of current levels, will come after 2010 compensation payments, Whitney, 40, said in a report dated Aug. 31 and obtained by Bloomberg News today. The industry’s payouts will be “down dramatically,” said Whitney, who started New York-based Meredith Whitney Group after correctly predicting Citigroup Inc.’s dividend cut in 2007.
“The key product drivers of Wall Street’s revenues and profits over the past decade have been in a structural decline over the past three years,” Whitney said in the report. “2010 marks the first year in many in which Wall Street-centric firms will go through structural changes.”
Barclays Plc, Credit Suisse Group AG and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc may lead a slowdown in hiring in Europe as the fixed-income trading boom fizzles out, recruiters said last month. Barclays Capital’s income from trading bonds and commodities fell 40 percent in the first half amid the sovereign debt crisis. Fixed-income, currencies and commodities trading was the biggest revenue contributor at investment banks from Deutsche Bank AG to Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
While regulatory reform, including higher capital requirements, will force some of these shifts, there will be a “deeper secular change” due to declining revenue in businesses such as securitization, Whitney wrote.
Banks around the world cut 330,000 jobs during the latest financial crisis, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Some have added employees recently as markets recovered. Barclays Capital hired about 3,600 people in the 12 months through June 30, while Credit Suisse hired 1,800 and RBS’s securities unit increased headcount by about 1,100.
Even though emerging markets will continue to expand, they won’t do so fast enough to offset the declines in the U.S. and Europe, Whitney said.

Gold Grabs New Record

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- The most widely traded gold contract posted a new settlement high Tuesday, as investors ploughed into assets seen as safer during times of economic distress. Fueled by a report that the European bank stress tests masked some problems, gold for December delivery ended $8.20, or 0.7%, higher at $1259.30 an ounce. That topped the settlement high for a most-active gold contract hit in June, of $1258.30 an ounce.

Back to Bearish?

With stocks down nearly 100 points on the Dow, and in the negative throughout the trading day, one has to wonder if the mood has shifted once again. Over the weekend, various prominent voices in the finance community have continued to assess the economic fundamentals, analyzing more closely the internals of last week's day, and are increasingly turning thumbs down on stocks and the macroeconomic picture.

During these consolidations, I take numerous small trades for 3-4 ticks each. They often last only a few minutes each.  There are numerous small bad trades, but more good trades. They add up!

Irish Bund Bailout Imminent?

from Zero Hedge:

The Irish-Bund spread is going nuts on reports that the ECB is bidding up sovereign debt once again, together with a WSJ report that the Stress Test was, as everyone with half a brain knew all too well, a blatant lie, and sovereign debt was misrepresented. Earlier, a report in the FT Deutschland suggested that the bailout of Anglo Irish alone, (not to mention AIB and Irish Nationwide) would be sufficient to threaten the country's solvency. Things domestically are no better, after a poll in the Sunday Independent found that 74% of respondents believed the country would default, and preceded earlier news that Irish consumer confidence plunged from 66.2 to 61.4. The IMF's recent expansion and creation of credit facilities is now roundly seen as having focused on Ireland, but many now believe that it may be too late and a Greek-type rescue is in the works as the second domino is about to topple. Hopefully the Irish will figure out the Ambrose Evans-Pritchard was right all along, and that the time to riot is now if they hope to get the same preferential treatment by the ECB/EU/IMF as was afforded to Greece... Because we all know what the endgame is now.

Signs of Sagging

Additional European Sovereign Debt Concerns

from Bloomberg:
Stocks and U.S. index futures fell, the euro weakened while Treasuries and bunds rallied on concern Europe’s debt crisis may worsen. Oil and copper retreated.
The MSCI World Index dropped 0.6 percent at 7:27 a.m. in New York. Futures on the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index lost 0.7 percent after U.S. markets were closed yesterday for the Labor Day holiday. The euro depreciated the most in a week against the yen. The yield on 10-year Treasuries slipped 4 basis points to 2.66 percent. The gap between German and Irish bond yields climbed to a record high, while German-Greek yield spread increased to the widest since May.
“Banks still face problems in regards to their capital ratios,” said Michael Koehler, head of strategy at Landesbank Baden-Wuerttemberg in Mainz, Germany. “Investors will keep worrying about a possible double dip in the next few weeks,” referring to a renewed recession.
Banks led stocks lower on concern they’ll require more capital to compensate for holdings of bonds in Europe’s weakest economies. Germany’s banking association said yesterday that the nation’s lenders need to raise $135 billion and Pacific Investment Management Co. said Greece still faces “substantial” default risk. Policy makers in Japan and Australia cited concerns over the outlook for the U.S. in keeping interest rates on hold today.
More than seven shares fell for every one that gained in the Stoxx Europe 600 Index, which lost 0.8 percent after reaching a four-week high yesterday. A government report showed German factory orders unexpectedly fell in July as demand in the euro region weakened, indicating the recovery in Europe’s largest economy is losing momentum. The MSCI Asia Pacific Index slid 0.2 percent.
Santander, Barclays
Banco Santander SA slid 2.3 percent and BNP Paribas SA lost 2.7 percent. Barclays Plc sank 3.6 percent as Britain’s third- largest bank named President Robert Diamond as chief executive officer, succeeding John Varley. The cost of insuring financial- company bonds against default climbed by the most in a month, with the Markit iTraxx Financial Index of credit-default swaps on 25 banks and insurers rising 8.5 basis points to 138, according to JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Rio Tinto Group led basic-resources stocks lower, losing 2.6 percent, as Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard clinched a deal to keep power. Gillard’s Labor government has proposed a tax on mining profits.
The decline in U.S. futures indicated the S&P 500 may pare last week’s 3.8 percent rally. President Barack Obama is planning to increase tax relief for businesses and federal spending on the nation’s transportation system to bolster an economy that’s losing jobs heading into the November congressional elections. The unemployment rate may approach 10 percent in coming months, according to economists at BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research and Morgan Stanley.
Greek, German Bonds
The German bund yield dropped 7 basis points to 2.27 percent. Greek bonds plunged, pushing the yield on the 10-year security up 28 basis points relative to bunds to 942 basis points, the most since the European Union and International Monetary Fund crafted a bailout package in May.
The Irish-German 10-year yield spread increased 37 basis points to 380 basis points, the highest since Bloomberg records began in 1991. The Portuguese-German spread was 352 basis points, from 333 basis points yesterday.
The yen rose against all 16 of its major peers, strengthening 1.3 percent to 106.99 versus the euro and 0.4 percent to 83.90 per dollar. The euro weakened 1 percent to $1.2751. Australia’s dollar dropped 0.6 percent against the U.S. currency.
Copper, Oil
Copper for delivery in three months fell 2.1 percent on the London Metal Exchange, the biggest drop since July 16. The S&P GSCI index of 24 commodities lost 0.8 percent, the first decline since Aug. 31. Corn was down 1.3 percent. Crude for October delivery retreated 2.3 percent to $72.90 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. Yesterday’s transactions will be booked with today’s for settlement purposes as there was no floor trading because of the Labor Day holiday. Brent crude for October settlement on the London-based ICE Futures Europe Exchange dropped 1.5 percent to $75.71 a barrel.
The MSCI Emerging Markets Index slipped 0.5 percent, the first decline in five days. OTP Bank Nyrt., Hungary’s largest lender, led the BUX index 1.5 percent lower. Russia’s Micex index lost 1.3 percent, dragged down by energy and mining companies.

Worried Wall Street Needs Miracle to Salvage Quarter

from Bloomberg:
After two months bankers would like to forget, Wall Street may need a September to remember to avoid closing the books on the worst quarter for investment banking and trading revenue since the peak of the financial crisis.
For the number of shares traded on U.S. exchanges to match last year’s third quarter, average daily volume for the rest of the month would have to top that of any trading day in the last three years. Debt trading also needs to pick up, as corporate bond trading in July and August was down 8 percent from the same period in 2009, according to Trace, the bond-price reporting system of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority.
Troubling economic data and uncertainty over European sovereign debt and the global recovery led investors to step back from the markets, analysts said. The result may be the lowest revenue from investment banking and trading for the five largest Wall Street banks since the fourth quarter of 2008, when they had combined negative revenue of $3.35 billion.
“Activity levels in the last three weeks of September should be a lot better than July and August, but it would have to almost be off-the-charts good to save the third quarter,” said Jeff Harte, a Chicago-based analyst at Sandler O’Neill & Partners LP. “I don’t think there’s going to be a lot more clarity about the macro environment, and that’s what people seem to be wrestling with before activity picks up.”
Stalled Recovery
The five largest Wall Street firms by investment-banking and trading revenue -- Goldman Sachs Group Inc., JPMorgan Chase & Co., Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Morgan Stanley -- may not get much relief from their advisory work.
While the dollar value of completed mergers and acquisitions is up slightly for the first two months of the quarter from the same period last year, debt and equity underwriting totals have fallen. And trading has come to dwarf investment banking on Wall Street: The five firms booked more than five times as much revenue from trading in the first half as from advisory and underwriting.
Trading volumes dropped in July and August as investors weighed data that hinted at a stalled economic recovery. Growth in gross domestic product in the second quarter was cut to 1.6 percent from the initial 2.4 percent. Sales of new homes in the U.S. dropped in July to the lowest level on record, and consumer confidence that month had the biggest decline since 2008. The Federal Reserve said on Aug. 10 that growth will likely be at a “more modest” rate than anticipated.
Trading Declines
Equity investors have traded a daily average of 14.2 billion shares on U.S. exchanges so far in the third quarter, according to Bloomberg data. That’s the worst start of any quarter since the first three months of 2009, when the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index touched its lowest point in almost 13 years, and 25 percent less than the average for last year’s third quarter, the data show.
To match the volume of the third quarter of 2009, investors would have to trade an average of 30.6 billion shares a day for the rest of September. That’s more than twice the daily average so far this quarter and higher than any single day since 2006.
Trading of U.S. equity options has declined for each of the past three months after jumping to a record 405 million contracts in May. Average daily volume on U.S. exchanges in the third quarter has fallen to 13.3 million contracts a day, down 23 percent from the prior quarter, according to data compiled by Bloomberg and Options Clearing Corp., the Chicago-based firm responsible for settling all U.S. options trades.
The average daily dollar amount of U.S. Treasuries traded in July and August was down 1.7 percent from 2009’s third quarter and 13 percent from last quarter, according to data from ICAP Plc, the world’s largest inter-dealer broker.
‘Sizable Bounce’
“The major investment banks are very dependent on high transaction volume, so there’s no escaping that being a drawback to their bottom-line results,” said William Fitzpatrick, a financial-industry analyst with Milwaukee-based Optique Capital Management, which oversees about $700 million, including JPMorgan and Bank of America shares. “I think we’ll get a sizable bounce in the fall, only because we’re coming off such a depressed level. That’s typical of the summer months, though this summer was worse than previous years.”
Spokesmen for the five banks declined to comment about third-quarter trading and investment-banking revenue.
While trading volumes are an indicator of performance, they may not correlate directly with firms’ revenue because banks make money on changes in the value of the securities they hold and transaction fees that may not be related to volume.
Fixed-Income Bets
Even if volumes stay low, fixed-income trading revenue will probably improve from the second quarter because firms are less likely to have bets that cause large losses than they had in the last quarter, said Brad Hintz, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein & Co. in New York.
Second-quarter fixed-income revenue at JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs missed some estimates as credit concerns spiked and the yield spread between corporate bonds and similar Treasuries widened 47 basis points over the three months. The spread has narrowed 16 basis points this quarter to 180 basis points, according to the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Broad Market Corporate Index.
“The big fixed-income players, JPMorgan and Goldman, performed badly in the second quarter, and the reason was they went into the quarter positioned for the credit markets to improve,” Hintz said. “They’ve positioned themselves much better for market conditions now.”
‘Dominant Business’
The five firms generated $67.1 billion in the first half of the year from advisory, debt and equity underwriting, and from trading stocks and bonds. That was down 12 percent from a year earlier. Trading and investment banking account for 34 percent of the five firms’ total revenue, ranging from 81 percent at New York-based Goldman Sachs to 21 percent at Bank of America in Charlotte, North Carolina.
Analysts surveyed by Bloomberg have cut their average third-quarter revenue estimates for the five banks by a total of $994 million since the beginning of August, to $90.9 billion from $91.9 billion, as they have scaled back expectations.
“Sales and trading, certainly for everybody, has been the dominant business over the last few years,” Seth Waugh, chief executive officer of Deutsche Bank AG’s Americas division, said in a Sept. 2 Bloomberg Radio interview. “That’s decreased, volumes have decreased and margins have decreased a little bit. That doesn’t mean that it isn’t going to be a great business again. It just means that it’s probably going to go through a little bit of a trough right now.”
M&A Deals
Companies worldwide completed $247.3 billion of mergers and acquisitions in the first two months of the quarter. That’s up from the same period last year, when they completed $239.3 billion of deals before ending the quarter with $352.7 billion.
A higher level of activity in announced deals may give hope for future quarters. Companies announced deals totaling $404.5 billion in July and August, more than double the $195.2 billion a year earlier. Those included a $40 billion hostile takeover bid by Melbourne-based BHP Billiton Ltd., the world’s largest mining company, for Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan Inc.
An increased number of deals will help banks generate greater fees and encourage a pickup in trading, said Richard Bove, an analyst at Rochdale Securities in Lutz, Florida.
“If the M&A market picks up the way I think it will, then M&A will give a boost to get trading going again,” Bove said in an Aug. 23 Bloomberg Television interview. “This recovery in trading is not going to be very dramatic, and it’s not going to be very quick. It’s going to be over a longer period of time.”
Hong Kong IPOs
Revenue may be diminished in future quarters as firms spin off, sell or shut down their proprietary trading desks to comply with the Volcker rule, which was passed in July as part of the U.S. financial overhaul. Goldman Sachs plans to disband its principal strategies business and New York-based JPMorgan will shut down its proprietary trading operations, people familiar with those plans have said.
Investment banks are having trouble taking advantage of one growth area. Hong Kong initial public offerings this year have raised almost five times as much as they did in the first eight months of last year, led by the $12 billion portion of Agricultural Bank of China Ltd., the world’s biggest IPO. Bankers are charging the lowest fees on record, just 2.2 percent on average, to arrange the IPOs, compared with 6.4 percent fees in the U.S., according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
The low trading volumes may also have an impact on some banks’ retail brokerage businesses, including Bank of America Merrill Lynch and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney. Morgan Stanley, based in New York, pushed back its brokerage profitability goals in July, saying that the May 6 market plunge scared away individual investors.
“Retail is absolutely moribund, there’s nothing going on in retail,” Sanford Bernstein’s Hintz said. “The retail investor has dug his foxhole and put on his helmet, and he’s just sitting there.”

U.S. Unemployment Rising Again

The jobless rate in the U.S. is likely to approach 10 percent in coming months as the economy fails to grow quickly enough to employ people rejoining the labor force, according to economists at BofA Merrill Lynch Global Research and Morgan Stanley.
Private payrolls climbed 67,000 in August, after a gain of 107,000 the previous month, and the unemployment rate rose to 9.6 percent, Labor Department figures showed Sept. 3. The economy expanded at a 1.6 percent annual rate in the second quarter, down from 3.7 percent in January through March.
Employers including government agencies have added 723,000 workers to payrolls so far in 2010, showing it’ll take years to recoup the 8.4 million jobs lost during the recession, the biggest employment slump in the post-World War II era. Still, the August employment report eased concerns the economy will falter and may postpone action by Federal Reserve policy makers aimed at bolstering the recovery.
“Growth is too sluggish to successfully bring down the unemployment rate,” said Michelle Meyer, a senior economist at BofA Merrill Lynch in New York. “At this stage, about one year into the recovery, this was still quite feeble job growth.”
BofA Merrill Lynch says the jobless rate will peak at 10.1 percent next year, up from a previous projection of 9.5 percent, with growth slowing to 1.8 percent for all of 2011, down from an earlier estimate of 2.3 percent.

Is Slowing Germany Manufacturing Sector a Global Leading Indicator?

German factory orders unexpectedly fell in July as demand in the euro region weakened, indicating the recovery in Europe’s largest economy is losing momentum.
Orders, adjusted for seasonal swings and inflation, declined 2.2 percent from June, when they surged a revised 3.6 percent, the Economy Ministry in Berlin said today. That’s the biggest drop since February 2009. Economists forecast a 0.5 percent gain, according to the median of 40 estimates in a Bloomberg News survey. From a year earlier, orders climbed 18 percent, when adjusted for working days.
Evidence of slowing growth comes after the German economy expanded at the fastest pace in two decades in the second quarter, boosted by exports. An index of manufacturing fell in August and investor confidence dropped to a 16-month low. Still, Daimler AG, the world’s second-biggest manufacturer of luxury cars, said yesterday that sales jumped in August.
“It’s a sign that Germany can’t decouple from the global economy,” said Alexander Koch, an economist at UniCredit in Munich. “While this is a backlash against last month’s surge and monthly figures can be volatile, the economy simply can’t continue to grow at the same pace as in the first half of the year.”

More European Debt Worries

from Fox Business:
Stock futures pointed to a lower open Tuesday as traders return to work after last week’s strong performance and the long holiday weekend.
As of 6:20 a.m. in New York, the Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were down 60 points, or 0.58%, to 10394, the S&P 500 index futures lost 7.8 points to 1095.70 and the Nasdaq 100 futures were down 8 points to 1859.00.
It’s a quiet start to the trading week with no major economic data and only a few company earnings reports this morning.
Stocks were weighed primarily down by a buoyed U.S. dollar, which in turn put pressure on dollar-denominated commodities such as oil.
In early trading, the dollar was down 1% against the euro and 1.4% against the Japanese yen. The British pound lost 0.9% against the dollar.  Traders cited a lack of news and lingering debt concerns out of Europe as the reasoning behind the dollar-based rally.
Oil was sharply lower in electronic trading, falling $1.67 a barrel, or 2.24%, to $72.93 while gold was down $3.70 to $1,247.40 a troy ounce. Copper futures were down 2.3%.
The energy and mining companies were the early decliners in U.S. equities, led lower by Exxon Mobil (XOM: 61.34 ,0.00 ,0.00%), BP (BP: 37.40 ,0.00 ,0.00%), Freeport McMoRan (FCX: 78.52 ,0.00 ,0.00%) and BHP Billiton (NYSE:NYSE:BHP).
Shares of the banks, most notably Barclays (BCS: 20.27 ,0.00 ,0.00%) may trade heavily today after the company announced that its CEO John Varney will step down and will be replaced with investment-banking head Robert Diamond.

from Bloomberg:
Even after a 750 billion euro ($960 billion) bailout for the weaker economies in the euro zone, investors are skittish about sovereign debt -- and about the banks that hold the region’s government bonds.
A default by Greece could trigger the collapse of banks with large sovereign-bond holdings, says Konrad Becker, a financial analyst at Merck Finck & Co. in Munich. “A default by one EU country would lead to an evaporation of trust in banks,” he says. “If investors aren’t willing to invest in banks anymore, then many banks will go bust in months, not years.”
The new concern about the fragility of the region’s banks comes as politicians and regulators are eager to claim progress in fixing the global financial system, almost two years after credit markets cracked, Bloomberg Markets magazine reports in its October issue.
The European Union has stress tested 91 lenders, giving 84 of them passing grades. In the U.S., President Barack Obama in July signed the biggest package of new U.S. banking laws since the Depression. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, meanwhile, is readying new capital and liquidity rules for world leaders to agree upon when the Group of 20 meets in Seoul in November.
Europe, however, faces a special challenge in righting its banks: the sovereign-debt crisis. Europe’s largest financial companies hold more than 134 billion euros in Greek, Portuguese and Spanish government bonds, according to a tally in May by Bloomberg News based on interviews and company statements.
Greek Debt
Even after the EU and International Monetary Fund worked out the rescue plan in May, investors are still demanding a high premium for buying Greek debt. As of Sept. 3, the yield was 11.28 percent on 10-year Greek bonds compared with 2.34 percent on similar German bonds. At the end of August, the gap between the two, the yield spread, was the widest it has been since the peak in May, just before European leaders agreed on the bailout.
Yields on Irish bonds jumped after Standard & Poor’s on Aug. 24 cut the country’s credit rating one step to AA-, citing concern that the rising cost of supporting Ireland’s struggling banks will increase its budget deficit. The yield spread versus German bonds climbed to the highest in at least 20 years.
The hesitancy among investors also shows up in the spreads on bank bonds, with some European institutions paying higher borrowing costs compared with their U.S. counterparts.
As of Sept. 2, buyers demanded an extra 383 basis points, or 3.83 percentage points, over the yield on government debt to own 5- to 10-year bonds sold by Paris-based BNP Paribas SA, according to Bank of America Merrill Lynch index data. The comparative premiums were 275 basis points for Citigroup Inc. bonds and 192 basis points for JPMorgan Chase & Co. bonds; both of those banks are based in New York.
‘Still Badly Damaged’
“We face a banking system that is still badly damaged and which is still trying to repair its balance sheets,” Bank of England Governor Mervyn King said on Aug. 11 at a press conference in London. “It has to raise funding at very high costs, and that makes it difficult for banks to lend.”
Lenders have been slow to raise the capital they need. With yields on European bank debt so high, the market has shrunk. The region’s banks, including U.K. lenders, sold about 18 billion euros of debt in August, the smallest amount for the month since 2004.
Many European institutions continue to rely on central banks for funding. In July, the European Central Bank loaned 132 billion euros for three months to 171 financial institutions. ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet on Sept. 2 extended emergency lending measures for banks into 2011. The bank will keep offering unlimited one-week and one-month loans until at least Jan. 18, and will offer additional three-month funds in October, November and December.
Parking Money
Wary of lending to each other, banks are also using the ECB to hold record amounts of their cash. On June 9, euro-zone lenders deposited a record 369 billion euros overnight at the ECB, more than in October 2008, during the credit meltdown.
“The amount banks have parked at the ECB is just outrageous,” says Florian Esterer, a fund manager at Zurich- based Swisscanto Asset Management AG who invests in financial stocks, including Commerzbank AG and Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc.
The bank-stress-test results, published on July 23, should help restore investor faith in the region’s financial industry, Trichet said at a press conference on Aug. 5. Still, those examinations fell short of addressing the possibility of a default by a euro-zone country.
Not Tested
Regulators believe the May bailout will succeed, says David Green, who was head of international policy at Britain’s Financial Services Authority from 1998 to 2004. “It would be quite perverse for governmental agencies to assume that the program isn’t going to work,” he says.
The tests covered government bonds held by banks for possible sale -- not those held as reserves on their balance sheets. Europe’s banks only have to write down sovereign debt in their reserves if there’s significant doubt about a country’s ability to repay in full or make interest payments. The region’s lenders have about 90 percent of their Greek sovereign debt on their balance sheets, according to a survey by Morgan Stanley.
Europe’s governments can’t afford to question the quality of bonds they’ve sold to banks, says Chris Skinner, chief executive officer of Balatro Ltd., a financial industry advisory firm in London. “Bankers have got Europe’s governments in their pockets, primarily because politicians cannot change the way lenders do business without undermining confidence in sovereign debt,” he says.
Toxic Assets
While they’re stuck with their government bond holdings, Europe’s banks are also still carrying much of the troubled assets they had during the 2008 meltdown. Euro-zone lenders will have written down about 3 percent of their assets from the peak of the credit crisis by the end of 2010, compared with 7 percent for U.S. banks, the IMF estimated in April. The steeper writedowns by U.S. banks are partly because they held a higher proportion of securities, the IMF said.
That doesn’t excuse the lack of candor shown by many European lenders about the unsellable assets on their books, says Raghuram Rajan, a finance professor at the University of Chicago. “European banks haven’t owned up to the large amounts of toxic debt that they hold,” says Rajan, who was chief economist at the IMF from 2003 to 2007.
“The stress tests weren’t severe enough,” says Julian Chillingworth, who helps manage $21 billion at Rathbone Brothers Plc, an investment firm in London. “Many bond investors aren’t convinced the Greeks are out of the woods.” And if the Greeks haven’t emerged from their crisis yet, then neither have the European banks that hold their debt.

Monday, September 6, 2010

The Neurosis of the Liberal Mind

“When the modern liberal mind whines about imaginary victims, rages against imaginary villains and seeks above all else to run the lives of persons competent to run their own lives, the neurosis of the liberal mind becomes painfully obvious.”  Lyle H. Rossiter, Jr., MD

Sunday, September 5, 2010

Europe: Doubling Down on Debt

Summer vacation is over and things in Europe may soon start rocking and rolling all over again. Not only is France about to experience its first 24 hour general strike this Tuesday in a long time, which will likely remind everyone else in Europe (hint Greece and Ireland) that austerity is the new normal across the Atlantic and the 14th annual monthly salary is not going to come back just because nobody is talking about it, but as the FT reports Europe needs to issue double the amount of debt in September compared to August. From the FT: "Eurozone governments will try to raise €80bn ($103bn) in September compared with new bond issuance of €43bn in August. Spain is expected to attempt to borrow €7bn in September compared with €3.5bn in August, according to ING Financial Markets." The dramatic ramp up in issuance is forcing the FT to speculate that "some of the weaker economies could fail to raise the amount of money they need as eurozone governments attempt to issue double the amount of debt this month compared with August." For all those who have been waiting for the perfect storm in Europe to finally develop the time of waiting may be over.
More from the FT:

Padhraic Garvey, head of rates strategy for developed markets at ING Financial Markets, said: “We are heading into a critical period as the chances rise that a government may fail to raise the money it needs.

“Spain, Portugal and Ireland are the obvious ones to worry about. Are investors willing to stay long, or buy the debt of these countries? I’m still not seeing investors willing to buy into the periphery.”

Some strategists say the return of most investors from holidays this week could increase volatility in these markets because many have put decisions on their portfolios on hold during the summer.


With most investors back at their desks, some could start selling peripheral debt in the coming weeks, particularly as the outlook for the global economy has deteriorated. In spite of some better than expected data out of the US last week, worries about a double-dip recession have increased.

But other strategists insist governments will have little difficulty in funding themselves, even if they have to pay higher premiums or yields to attract investors. They say countries such as Portugal and Ireland have already raised most of the money they need this year.

Government bond yields of the peripheral countries, however, may come under further selling pressure.
Expect the stock market to begin acting even more deranged over the next three weeks, now that the Fed has to perform double duty to make sure that all the upcoming auctions don't clog the system to a halt, and the realization that Europe has been bankrupt all along in 2010 isn't comprehended by too many of the "naifs."

More From David Rosenberg on Jobs. OUCH!

As with the Manufacturing PMI report, however, the details point to a far less rosy picture than the headline figure and market reaction suggest, again well summarized by Gluskin Sheff’s David Rosenberg via The Pragmatic Capitalist here in which he notes (we quote):

  1. Aggregate hours worked were flat.
  2. All the employment gains were part-time — full-time employment, as per the Household Survey, plunged 254,000.
  3. Those working part-time for “economic reasons” surged 331,000 — the biggest increase in six months.
  4. While private payrolls were better than expected, 10,000 of that +67,000 tally reflected returning construction workers who had been on strike.
  5. Manufacturing employment was down 27,000 and total goods producing jobs were flat — hardly signs of a robust economic backdrop.
  6. The diffusion index for private payrolls actually fell to 53.0 from 56.7 in July — a seven-month low. It was 68.0 at the April high, which is consistent with an economy slowing down to stall-speed.
  7. The labor market gap widened with the all-inclusive U6 unemployment rate rising to a four-month high of 16.7% from 16.5% in July. This is why the odds are stacked against a sustained acceleration in wages.
Keep in mind that markets did not have much time to digest the US jobs reports Friday before markets closed, and could well take back gains next week upon reflection on the above details. Volumes in the stock market rallies were exceptionally thin, further undermining out belief in the rally
In sum, last week’s market movers suggest a rally that is a mere countermove in the longer term downtrend, particularly considering the hurdles that lie ahead as discussed below.

Saturday, September 4, 2010

Jobs Report Created False Hope

John Weisenthal of Clusterstock discussed his thoughts on Friday's job figures and put up an image of the scariest jobs chart ever (HT: Réal):

The key thing to realize about today's good jobs report is that it was only good relative to expectations. Private sector job creation of 67,000 is not that impressive in any real sense.

And indeed, the latest update of the scariest jobs chart ever from Calculated Risk -- which shows how deep these jobs losses are compared to past recessions -- shows this comeback still isn't anything like past comebacks, and it will be ages before we get back to even.
Private sector job creation is the key to any sustainable recovery, but as the chart above shows, you need to create a lot of jobs to repair the devastation since 2007. In that sense, today's figures are not that impressive, but one can only hope they're indicating better days ahead.
Phil Izzo of the WSJ provided reaction to today's figures from a number of economists:
It is a sigh of relief. The labor market in August was lethargic, but better than feared reducing the fears of a double-dip recession. Private payrolls went up 67,000 even though the overall nonfarm payroll fell 54,000 due to the census layoff. –Sung Won Sohn, Smith School of Business and Economics

The August employment report confirms the “Big Stall” rather than outright contraction in the economy… Saying the economy isn’t about to contract is not, unfortunately, the same thing as saying that growth momentum has returned. If anything, a read into the details of the report indicates the extent of the economy’s stall. The growth in private payrolls was confined to Healthcare & Social Assistance (which seems to go up every month regardless), temp workers plus construction — of which 10,000 of the 19,000 were returning strikers. Everything else summed to zero and all of these sectors reported numbers that were marginally on one side or the other of zero. –Steven Blitz, Majestic Research

The soft patch for jobs may have been extended for a fourth month today, but momentum in the economy is building and we can rule out a double-dip. –Christopher Rupkey, Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi

Government employment losses in August more than offset the gains in private-sector employment. Most of the drop in public-sector payrolls is explained by the departure of 114,000 temporary Census workers. However, state and local government payrolls also continued to shrink in August. Since the start of this year state and local public-sector payrolls have fallen 135,000, or almost 17,000 per month. These job losses are almost certainly linked to the expected end of federal fiscal relief under the Administration’s stimulus program. –Gary Burtless, Brookings Institution

Nonfarm [private] payrolls expanded by 67,000 in August… 67,000 jobs is just not enough and it cannot be spun otherwise. At the same time, the economy does continue to add a modest amount of jobs — since December 2009, private employment has increased by 763,000 jobs. This is not enough, especially so given the 8+ million jobs shed during the recession, but it is something. Given the increase in corporate profits among U.S. corporations, ongoing gains in payrolls should not be surprising. –Dan Greenhaus, Miller Tabak

In August, job creation occurred across a number of sectors, including health care, construction, mining, and temporary help services for professional and business services. Despite the decline in total jobs, this report was mildly positive, as private sector jobs helped alleviate some of the Census losses. A recovery is clearly underway, although it will be a slow one for the job market. –Jason Schenker, Prestige Economics

Construction employment registered an uptick for the first time since April. The nonres category accounted for all of the gain. This may be related to a ramping up of infrastructure projects. Manufacturing employment fell for the first time since December but this reflected a seasonal unwind of the rise in auto industry jobs that was evident in July. Moreover, the average workweek in the manufacturing sector ticked up 0.1 hours, so we see a manufacturing activity excluding motor vehicles up a sharp 0.8% in August –David Greenlaw, Morgan Stanley

Private payrolls increased by 67,000 last month, down from 107,000 in July. However, that apparent slowdown may just be an illusion. Employment at vehicle manufacturing plants jumped by 22,000 in July and then fell back by exactly the same amount in August. We suspect this is a distortion caused by the unusually small number of plant shutdowns this summer. Strip that out and private employment growth actually pick up a little bit last month. –Paul Ashworth, Capital Economics

It looks like the momentum in employment has been roughly steady in recent months at a modest pace that will not be enough to hold the unemployment rate steady. At current rates of labor force participation, the economy needs to generate 100,000 jobs to hold the unemployment rate steady. –Julia Coronado, BNP Paribas

Viewed in isolation, a 67,000 private payroll increase this far into the recovery is very poor. But viewed against low expectations and against fears that the economy may be tumbling into a double-dip recession, today’s report is good news. It suggests that the recovery may be wobbly but that it is still staggering forward. –Nigel Gault, IHS Global Insight

The fact that the labor market did not stall in August as many had feared suggests the recovery is sustained, if not robust. The increase in temp hiring suggests that employers, while suspicious about the strength of demand, see orders strong enough to justify taking on more help. The most recent Challenger report also suggests that companies have cut payrolls so deeply that any increase in demand will require more hiring. Businesses have squeezed as much as they can from their current workforces; once the economy gains some momentum, more permanent hiring is sure to follow. –Sophia Koropeckyj, Moody’s Economy.com

Not a double dip, but still pretty anemic. So, stronger-than-expected, yes. Strong, no. –Stephen Stanley, Pierpoint Securities

The small amount of job gains during the past few months not only reflects the response to slow output growth, but also a lack of confidence going forward. While this expansion might seem similar to recent post-recession periods, it is in fact much different. The economy as a whole has been weakened by a dismal housing market and slow consumption, which especially hamper small and medium- sized enterprises. Modest gains in private sector jobs, coupled with the large decline in government employment, are consistent with our forecast for continued sluggish growth. –Bart van Ark, The Conference Board

The labor market has entered a holding pattern. After relatively mild improvements earlier this year, the key indicators of the strength of the labor market have shown virtually no improvement in recent months. The private sector has added an average of 78,000 jobs each month for the past three months, not nearly enough to begin to reduce unemployment. –Heather Boushey, Center for American Progress

Hourly earnings post their biggest rise since January of this year at 0.3% month-over-month, this translates into a 1.7% month-over-month in wages. Hours worked which are still low remained at 34.2; we would look for this to improve further before we started to see any real aggressive in additions to payrolls. Temporary help also resumes additions, we like this as a leading indicator as temporary workers are far more flexible and firms are more willing to take them on in the early stages of a recovery. In a labour force of 154 million, these increases are not going to set the world alight (or more importantly drive strong consumer spending), but people will take encouragement where their can find it especially heading into a holiday weekend. –David Semmens, Standard Chartered Bank

The largest increases in unemployment were among African Americans who saw their overall rate rise 0.8 percentage points to 16.3 percent, near the recession peak. The unemployment rate for black teens jumped 4.8 percentage points to 45.4%. Unemployment for Hispanics edged down to 12.0 percent, a full percentage point below its year-ago level. –Dean Baker, Center for Economic and Policy Research
Dean Baker is also predicting a 10% decline in house prices for the year and recently wrote this comment in counterpunch, Burning Down the House:
The howls of surprised economists were everywhere last week as the government reported on Tuesday that July had the sharpest single-month plunge in existing home sales on record. The next day the Commerce Department reported that new home sales hit a post-war low in July.

All the economists who had told us that the housing market had stabilized and that prices would soon rebound looked really foolish yet again. To understand how lost these professional error-makers really are it is only necessary to know that the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA) puts out data on mortgage applications every week. The MBA index plummeted beginning in May, immediately after the last day (April 30) for signing a house sale contract that qualified for the homebuyers tax credit.

It typically takes 6-8 weeks between when a contract is signed and a house sale closes. The plunge in applications in May meant that homebuyers were not signing contracts to buy homes. This meant that sales would plummet in July. Economists with a clue were not surprised by the July plunge in home sales.

What should be clear is that the tax credits helped to pull housing demand forward. People who might have bought in the second half of 2010 or even 2011 instead bought their home before the tax credit expired. Now that the credit has expired, there is less demand than ever, leaving the market open for another plunge in prices. The support the tax credit gave to the housing market was only temporary.

It is worth asking what was accomplished by spending tens of billions of dollars to prop up the market for a bit over a year with these tax credits. First, this allowed millions of people to sell their home over this period at a higher price than would have otherwise been the case. The flip side is that more than five million people bought homes at prices that were still inflated by the bubble. Many of these buyers will see substantial loses when they resell their house.

The banks also had a stake in this. The homebuyers tax credit prevented prices from declining as rapidly as would have been the case otherwise. This allowed millions of homeowners to be able to sell their home at a price where they could pay off their mortgage. This made banks who could have been holding underwater mortgages very happy.

Of course someone had to issue the mortgage to all those people who bought homes at prices that are still inflated by the bubble. The overwhelming majority of the mortgages issued in the last year and a half are insured by the government, either through Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, or through HUD. So, taxpayers are carrying the risk that further price declines will push these mortgages underwater, not banks or private investors.

The further plunge in house prices will have serious implications for the course of the recovery. By my calculations, the decline in house prices through the first half of 2009 eliminated $5-6 trillion of the $8 trillion of housing equity created by the bubble. Look to the further declines in the rest of this year to eliminate most or all of the remaining bubble equity.

The loss of this wealth will further dampen growth. This should drive home the fact that house prices, like the NASDAQ following the tech crash, are not coming back. Homeowners will have to come to grips with this massive loss of wealth. While many commentators (no doubt the surprised ones) complain that consumption is low, the reality is that consumption is still at an unusually high level relative to disposable income.

Furthermore, with a huge cohort of baby boomers approaching retirement with almost no wealth, there will be more need to save than ever. This need to save is accentuated by the plans of those in the Obama Administration and the congressional leadership to cut Social Security.

This means that we should expect consumption spending to weaken sharply in the second half of 2010 and into 2011 as the savings rate rises into the 8-10 percent range, further slowing economic growth. This comes against a backdrop where final demand had only been growing at a 1.2 percent average rate over the last four quarters.

Final demand is GDP, excluding inventories. Growth was boosted over the last year by the restocking of inventories. This process is largely completed, which means that we should expect GDP growth to be pretty much equal to final demand growth going forward.

Starting with a 1.2 percent growth rate, then throwing in weaker consumption due to further house price declines, state and local government cutbacks, and the winding down of stimulus, it is questionable whether growth will even remain positive over the next four quarters. Given all these negative factors, it is very hard to construct a story showing the economy on a healthy growth path, even though many economists still seem to think it is. Of course these economists were probably surprised by last month’s home sales data.
These are sobering thoughts from an economist who was among the first to predict the US housing crisis. Even if job creation picks up, it will do little to dent the fall in house prices. So while today's figures were better than expected, much more is needed to get the US economy back on solid footing. Below, I leave you with an overview of the August jobs report.

Pacing a More Realistic Job Growth Estimate

Recently there has been a surge in cherry picked employment charts highlighting that the Obama administration has done a great job in rescuing the economy. The premise goes: after dropping to as much as 700K+ jobs lost per month, the administration has managed to pull off a miraculous recovery and now we are riding on a wave of 8 consecutive "private jobs" beats in a row. This argument is so shallow we won't even bother with it. Perhaps the "economists" who espouse this theory will be so kind in their next iteration of their charts to overlay the monthly US debt issuance side by side with the jobs number. Because you see if you drown the economy in unrepayable debt, while using transfer payments to fund the digging of trenches by every man, woman and child who makes up the labor pool, then yes - you may get 0%, or even negative, unemployment overnight. Will it bankrupt the country (even faster)? Why, of course. But whoever said those who discuss politics subjectively ever care about the long-term implications of reality. So in the vein of sharing pretty charts, here is one: we show job losses since the beginning of the Recession (excluding for the impact of census hiring), juxtaposed to the natural growth rate of the Labor Pool (and not the artificial one, which according to the BLS is the same now as it was a year ago). We discover that i) 7.6 Million absolute jobs have been lost since the beginning of the Recession; ii) that a record 10.5 Million jobs (and you won't find this statistic anywhere), have been lost when factoring in for the natural growth of the Labor Pool of 90-100K a month (we use the lower estimate, which also happens to be the CBO's estimate), and that iii) assuming we expect to return to the jobs baseline level as of December 2007 (or an unemployment rate of 5%) by the end of Obama's second term (and we make the big assumption there will be a second term), Obama needs to create 230,000 jobs each and every month consecutively from September through November 2016 in order for the total jobs lost to be put back into the labor force, and that iv) an optimistic (if more realistic) projection of jobs returning to the work force means the return the baseline will occur in 2019, some 7 years after the start of the last recession. The point of these observations is not to cast political blame on either party: we are in this predicament due to the combined stupidity, corruption and greed of both parties. The question is how do we get out of here. And unfortunately for all those hoping that a return to a normal, baseline past is possible, please forget it (i.e., the New Normal is really real), at least for the next 7 years. This also means that any charting, technical analysis and other "reversion to the mean" approaches of forecasting the future will all end up sorely lacking and misrepresenting the final outcome.
Chart 1: a simple baseline chart that shows where we were, where we are, and where we are going, with the assumption of recovering all labor force growth-adjusted jobs losses from December 2007 through the end of Obama's second term. The conclusion: the economy needs 229,300 jobs per mont (incidentally, for the simplistic read on the labor force which does not account for demographic changes, which economists tend to conveniently forget all too often, a 230K jobs pick up a month, means a recoupment of baseline jobs lost in June of 2013).

Chart 2: We demonstrate that the cumulative jobs lost since December 2007, are in fact materially greater when adjusting for a realistic change in the labor force, instead of that presented by the administration, which naively expect people to believe that the labor force in August 2010 (154,110) was lower than that in August 2009 (154,426). That in the meantime the US population grew by 2.5 million seems to make no difference to the administration. Which only means that sooner or later this labor force participation will catch up to the numbers. Either way, we factor for it, and assume that the labor force was growing by 90K every month since the start of the recession, and add the cumulative differential to the jobs lost. The result: in the 33 months through August, the US has lost not 7.6 million jobs, but 10.5 million: a stunning 38% delta.

Obviously, all these projections are unrealistic. So let's take them down to some version of reality... even if it is Bank of America's. We take the most optimistic Wall Street projetions we could find - traditionally those belong to Bank of America's Ethan Harris. In a note released to clients, Harris discusses his revised jobs forecast:

Under the weaker growth trajectory we are now penciling in:
  • Private payrolls manage tepid monthly gains of just 25,000 through the end of 2010. As the growth recession fades in the second half of 2011, gains in private payroll employment should accelerate. We expect average monthly gains of 125,000 in the fourth quarter of 2011.
  • Therefore, for most of 2010 and 2011, employment growth is not expected to keep up with the rise in the labor force, which means the unemployment rate heads north. We expect a steady increase to 10.1% by the second quarter with a slow fall slightly below 10.0% by the end of 2011.
So let's adjusted the chart using Bank of America's projections, which assumesa gradual increase in the unemployment rate to 10% by Q3 2010 and a decline since then. We chart these projections on the chart below. According to this adjusted case, the payroll number will never return to the December 2007 baseline for the duration of Obama's term, even if one assumes 200K job pick ups beginning in January 2012 and continuing every month thereafter (as we have done). In November 2016 we forecast an unemployment rate of 5.7% using these assumptions. They are presented visually below:

And just to demonstrate what the recession will look like assuming even this quite optimstic assumption, here is the famous post WW2 recession comparison chart adjusted for an expansion of the depression (let's not split hairs here) labor force, that started in December 2007: it is shaping up to be 7 years before the jobs lost finally are put back into the system. And that's for those optimistically inclined.

So before everyone gets all political on who has done a more bang up job of destroying the economy, perhaps both sides can explain how they each got the US to a point where even wildly optimstic projections assume that the length of the most recent economic slowdown will take 85 months to resolve (and, in all reality, far, far longer).

Scariest Jobs Chart Ever

Friday, September 3, 2010

David Rosenberg Points Out Something Fishy With Latest Economic Data

The latest batch of data has been highly confusing, to say the least. The chain store sales data were skewed by one-offs, such as retroactive jobless benefit checks that were mailed out in early August and the growing number (17 this year) of States offering sales tax holidays. We estimate that absent these influences, year-on-year sales growth would have been closer to 1% than 3%.
The spending data also belied the information contained in the Conference Board’s consumer confidence survey, as the facts-on-the ground ‘present situation’ index sagged to 24.9 in August from 26.4 in July — only 5% of the time in the past has it been so low. The ISM manufacturing index, which really got the ball rolling on this ‘take out the double-dip’ trade, managed to spike even though the three leading sub-indices — new orders, backlogs and vendor performance — all declined in what was a 1-in-100 event.
Not only that, but the employment component of the ISM surged to its highest level since December 1983, and yet the manufacturing employment segment of the payroll survey fell 27,000 — the first decline this year and the sharpest falloff since last October. Furthermore, the manufacturing diffusion index slumped to a seven-month low of 47 from 53 — in other words, fewer than half of the industrial sector was adding to staff requirements last month. It begs the question as to what exactly the ISM is measuring.
The list of inconsistencies in the data didn’t stop there. The entire increase in private sector employment in August was in the service sector — mostly health and education, which says little about the cyclical state of the economy. Yet 90 minutes after the jobs number was released, we got the ISM non-manufacturing survey and it flashed a contraction in services employment to a seven-month low of 48.2 from 50.9 in July.
Just a tad confusing, but the newly found bullish view of the economy is sort of corroborating evidence.
The employment report did not detract from the view that the economy is losing steam. The fourth quarter of a recovery typically sees real GDP growth of over 6% at an annual rate, but in this post-bubble credit collapse, what we got this time was 1.6% at an annual rate in Q2.
Moreover, there is nothing in the data to suggest anything but a further slowing in Q3, and the only reason why there is no contraction this quarter is because it looks as though we are getting another lift from inventories — though now the buildup looks involuntary, which will cast a cloud on fourth-quarter GDP barring a sudden reversal in the declining trend in real final sales.
Private payrolls were +247,000 when the equity market peaked in April, it slowed to +107,000 by July and was +67,000 last month. What does that suggest about the trend? Ditto for goods-producing employment, which was +67,000 in April, subsequently softened to +37,000 by July, and in August was the grand total of zero.
One can easily draw the conclusion from the data that we have dodged a bullet. But that does not mean we are out of the woods. Employment is a coincident indicator. Leading indicators, such as the ECRI, continue to deteriorate and to levels still consistent with nontrivial double-dip risks. Keep this in mind — private payrolls came in at +97,000 in November 2007 and the “Great Recession” began the next month. In other words, the +67,000 tally we saw today basically tells you nothing about how the pace of economic activity is going to unfold as we move into the fall.

Citi's Robert Buckland Declares the End of the "Equity Cult"

Citi's Robert Buckland is out with the must read report of the weekend, especially for all the optimists who believe that despite the ongoing depression (and as many have demonstrated, all the talk about a double dip is moot, as America has never left the depression, or as Rosie calls it a period of prolonged economic subpar activity: the latest NFP number merely reinforces the theme of economic deterioration), and despite the 17 weeks in retail equity outflows (which would be a contrarian signal if there was hope that retail would ever feel safe enough to return in stocks. After nearly 5 months of no change in trend, the debate can be put to rest, if at least for 2010) there is still hope. There very well may not be - Citi has just pronounced the "Equity Cult" dead: "It has taken 10 years, and two 50% bear markets, to reverse this cult. European and Japanese equities are already trading on dividend yields above government bond yields. US equities are almost there as well. An immediate reincarnation of the equity cult seems unlikely. Global corporates, especially the mega-caps,  rushed to exploit cheap financing as the equity cult inflated. They have been slow to redeem equity now that the cult has deflated. Equity oversupply remains a drag on share prices." And as more and more companies and investors shift to a de-equitization theme, the trendline in allocation for the US pension assets will soon revert to that seen when the "Equity Cult" began, or roughly 20% of all assets, with bonds taking on an ever greater precedence of asset allocation (incidentally the UK is already back to the equity/debt relative investment levels of the early 1960s). What does this mean for capital flows? "A reduction in equity holdings back to pre-1959 levels (around 20% of total assets) would indicate considerable selling pressure to come. For US private sector pension funds alone, that would imply a further $1900bn reduction in equity weightings. The evidence suggests that there could still be considerable institutional selling to come."
So let's recap what the medium- and long-term trends for the market are:

  • $2 trillion in equity sales from pension funds alone as capital flows normalize now that the "Equity Cult" is dead
  • A seemingly endless push into fixed income by an aging demographic meaning billions more in ongoing monthly domestic stock mutual fund redemptions
  • Hedge funds which are underperforming the market massively, and which will see an explosion in redemption letters as the end of Q3 approaches
  • An inevitable change in the tax regime over the next 4-5 months, which as Guggenheim pointed out, will force investors to sell billions in stock to catch a sunsetting beneficial capital gains tax.
And yet what happens - the market surges on a negative NFP number that was negative but better by a factor of noise, compared to whisper expectation, as robotic traders pick up on the positive feedback loops to take the market higher one more time as soon everything collapses.
For all those who believe in 17x forward P/Es (expecting a 20% rise in corprate earnings in 2011 with a flat GDP indicates a serious overdoes on medicinal hopium) - Good luck chasing the bouncing ball.
For all those others, who feel like micturating upon the grave of the "Equity Cult" here are the highlights from the Citi report.
Bond vs Equities - Then and Now (this will be familiar to all those who have read Albert Edwards' recent pieces):
In July, global equities rebounded despite continued falls in government bond yields. This defied the strongly positive relationship between equities and bond yields seen since 2000. Many equity investors worry that this decoupling will be resolved by the bond markets being proven “right”. The implications of this are worrying — the last time US treasury yields were down at these levels, the S&P (currently 1050) was nearer 800.

We have pointed out that equities actually have a decent track record when these decouplings have occurred in the past1. Certainly Citi’s equity and bond market forecasts suggest that this current breakdown in the relationship is more likely to be resolved through rising bond yields than falling equity prices. However, we also understand that many investors think we will be proven wrong.

We can’t help but suspect that this hot debate about the relative attractions of bonds against equities — whether one is pricing in the double dip but the other is not, whether one is pricing in deflation but the other is not — is mere froth on top of a much more profound reassessment of the merits of the two asset classes. In particular, has the “cult of the equity” been replaced by the “cult of the bond”? To answer this we first take a look at the origins of the cult of the equity.

The rise of the cult of the equity is reflected in institutional asset allocations. Figure 3 shows the weighting of US private sector pension funds in equities and fixed income as derived from the Fed’s Flow of Funds data. Back in 1952, US private sector pension funds held just 17% of their assets in equities compared to 67% in fixed interest. Over the next 50 years, these weightings reversed — at the peak in 2006, the same funds held 69% in equities and 18% in fixed interest. Of course, some of the increase in equities will reflect the outperformance over the period.

The picture looks similar in the UK (Figure 4). Back in 1962, ONS data suggest that UK pension funds held more in bonds than equities. That reversed in the 1960s, as equity weightings increased aggressively. At the peak in the early 1990s, UK pension funds held 76% of assets in equities compared to just 12% in bonds. It seems that UK pension funds embraced the cult of the equity more enthusiastically than their US counterparts, perhaps as a result of a desire to buy equities as a hedge against the UK’s more significant inflation problems.

We can also see the rise (and fall) of the equity cult in mutual fund flows. Figure 5 shows US mutual fund equity inflows going back to 1984. These peaked above $300bn in 2000. European fund inflows peaked in the same year at €180bn (Figure 6). US equity inflows recovered as markets rallied in 2003-07. European equity inflows did not.
Why the cult is now dead?
It seems that the cult of the equity began in the late 1950s. Why? Many justifications have been put forward. Most obviously, the 1950s marked the beginning of a welcome period of peace and prosperity following a tumultuous 50 years that included two world wars and a major economic depression.

The rise in equity weightings coincided with Markowitz’s first considerations of modern portfolio theory. This promoted the belief that a well-diversified equity portfolio could achieve superior returns while helping to reduce risk. It was clearly the view of George Ross Goobey, manager of the Imperial Tobacco pension fund who was generally perceived to be the godfather of the cult of the equity in the UK. Ross Goobey liquidated his entire fixed interest portfolio in the 1950s and invested the proceeds in equities. This was highly controversial at the time — he was banned from teaching students at the UK Institute of Actuaries.

Other factors may have helped to promote the cult of the equity. Most pension funds were relatively immature back in the 1950s, so giving them a better ability to absorb short-term equity volatility in search of longer-term returns. Equities were seen as a good match against the wage-driven liabilities of defined benefit pension schemes. Equities offered a decent inflation hedge long before index-linked bonds were ever invented. This characteristic was particularly attractive in the 1970s and 1980s. The list of academic justifications goes on and on.

Performance-chasers

But perhaps most convincing is the argument that the cult of the equity was the product of a period of spectacular  outperformance from the asset class. This became self-fulfilling. Pension funds bought more and more equities because they kept outperforming. Insurance companies (except in the US, where their exposure to equities has been limited by law) and retail  investors couldn’t resist the same trade. Figure 7 shows the annual returns from US equities and government bonds divided into decades since the 1920s. We also show the annual returns for the total period.

Since 1920, even including the dreadful experience of the last decade, US equities have generated a healthy annual return of 10.9% compared to a bond return of 6.1%. The most spectacular equity performance (especially relative to bonds) was not in the roaring 1920s, 1980s or 1990s, but in the 1950s. Perhaps this is what brought investor attention back to equities. It took  many years for the wounds of the 1929 crash to heal — US equities only managed to regain their pre-1929 crash levels in 1954. But from there, a new 40-year love affair with equities began. The 1970s were tricky, but equities did no worse than bonds. Indeed, by the end of the 1990s, the long-term outperformance of equities over bonds looked truly spectacular. $100 invested in US equities in 1950 would have been worth $58,380 at the end of 1999 versus $1,651 in treasuries. Those two numbers probably say more about the cult of the equity than any long academic study.
Why Is There A Cult Switch?
The evidence suggests that the cult of the equity began in the 1950s and peaked in the late 1990s — that’s a 40-year bull market. Since then, it seems that the investor love affair with equities has soured.

Many of arguments associated with the cult of the equity have since come under attack. Inflation seems much less of a problem. Equities have never been particularly good at hedging inflation anyway, and now index-linked bonds can do a much better job. The long duration of the equity asset class becomes less desirable for pension funds as populations mature and retirement dates approach. Defined contribution investors (where the individual takes the risk) may be less willing to tolerate volatile equity returns than the old defined benefit plans (where the employer takes the risk).

But most importantly, it is dreadful returns that are increasingly putting investors off equities. Since the end of 1999, global equities have returned just 4% in total. Not only have equity returns been trivial, but the volatility has been brutal. Having two 50% bear markets in one decade is enough to test the patience of the most determined equity cultist. Just as strong returns helped to build the cult of the equity in the 1950s, so weak returns are tearing it down now.

Investor appetite for global equities is falling. Figure 3 shows that in 2009 US private sector pension funds held 55% of total assets in equities compared to 70% in 2006. Figure 4 suggests that UK pension funds cut their equity weighting to 39% in 2009, down from the 76% high in 1993. The 2009 rebound in equity prices has helped to reverse some of this decline in equity weightings, but most investor intention surveys suggest that the secular reduction in equity weightings is likely to continue.
How much worse will it get?
How far could this go? A reduction in equity holdings back to pre-1959 levels (around 20% of total assets) would indicate considerable selling pressure to come. For US private sector pension funds alone, that would imply a further $1900bn reduction in equity weightings. The story looks similar amongst retail investors. Equity inflows into US mutual funds have not recovered from the 2007-09 bear market (Figure 5). European equity inflows never recovered from the 2000-03 bear market (Figure 6).

The evidence suggests that there could still be considerable institutional selling to come. Developed market pension funds have cut their equity weightings from peaks but there is still a long way before they get back down to pre-cult levels. For a broader global comparison, we look at the 2010 Towers Watson Global Pensions Assets Survey (Figure 8). Given different data samples, this might not correspond with the long-term historical data series that we have already shown for the US and UK, but it is a useful guide to regional variations.
What does Japan teach us?
Japan may be a useful guide to an unwinding equity cult. According to Towers Watson, in 1998 Japanese pension funds held 55% in equities, still remarkably high given the dire performance of the Japanese market through the decade. Japanese pension funds now hold 36% of total assets in equities and that number seems likely to head lower. Bonds have been the key beneficiaries of equity outlflows. Elsewhere in the world, Australian pension funds have a high equity weighting although our local strategists have argued that the compulsory superannuation fund structure has embedded the equity culture more firmly than in other parts of the world. Continental European funds are already firmly tilted away from equities towards bonds, so the scope for further equity outflows might be more limited.

Emerging Markets remain one bright area amidst the gloom. Figure 9 shows annual global equity inflows as measured by EPFR. This confirms the sorry state of developed market inflows, but it also shows that the appetite for Emerging Markets equities has been much more robust.
The cult is dead. Long-live the cult
As the cult of the equity fades, it is being a replaced by a new cult of the bond. It is argued that bonds are more appropriate in a world where deflation, not inflation, is the main threat. Liability Driven Investing (LDI) advocates usually promote the liability-matching benefits of bonds over equities. Ageing populations would seem to favour bonds over equities — most “lifestyle” pension schemes automatically switch equities into bonds as a worker approaches retirement age. Perhaps most importantly, bonds have handsomely outperformed equities in the past decade. Since 2000, global equities have returned 4% (0.3% per year), while global government bonds have returned 103% (6.9% per year). The list of factors favouring bonds is as long as that favouring equities back in the 1990s.

These arguments are reflected in rising pension fund bond weightings (Figure 3 and Figure 4). We can also see that mutual fund inflows now favour bonds, although not yet as consistently and heavily as they favoured equities in the late 1990s (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
But even if there is no bond cult, the stock chasing era is over: Conclusion
Of course we can (and will) carry on arguing about whether bonds or equities will be proven “right” after the recent decoupling. We can (and will) carry on arguing about the likelihood of a double-dip in the global economy. We can (and will) carry on arguing about whether the developed world is heading into a Japan-style deflationary spiral. Each outcome should have meaningful implications for the direction of global equity and bond prices.

However, we can’t help wondering if this misses the point. With the notable exception of Emerging Markets, what is really going on is a long-term shift in investor appetite for equities and bonds. It will take more than the avoidance of a double-dip to turn the equity outflows around. Sure equity prices would probably rise in the short term if that were to happen, but a sustainable rerating could only be achieved if investors were to be attracted back to the asset class. Although likely to be painful in the short run, an inflation-inspired global bond sell-off would probably offer the best chance of that happening. That still seems pretty unlikely for now.

The Citi view on the outlook for the global economy could be best described as “uninspiring, but not disastrous”. But rather than furiously arguing about whether that view is right and if it is already reflected in share prices, perhaps we would be better served by accepting that, from a valuation perspective, it is what it is. For all sorts of reasons, both cyclical and structural, equities are likely to remain “cheap” against bonds for some time yet.

So it is what it is. Investors are unlikely to pile back into global equities any time soon. It looks like they are likely to sell weightings down and move further into bonds. This is convenient for government bond issuers given that they have such vast amounts of bonds to sell. Equity and bond valuations will continue to reflect these flows. Maybe global equities can move higher with rising profits but, outside Emerging Markets, the prospect of a 1980/90s-style rerating still seems a very long way off.
Indeed, it is what it is: you can't fund a trillion dollar bond bubble, and see equity allocations at the same time. There is a reason why Albert Edwards sees the S&P in the 400 range: you can't have an increasingly more frugal investors buying both, and you can't have central banks buying everything without risking a completel collapse in the faith of all currencies. In retrospect, it is really simple. There are those who believe they are immaculate daytraders, and believe they can make money chasing everything dip in stocks. We wish we had their skill. Since we don't we would rather put our bet on where the age old adage of follow the money says stocks willl end up going. And that is much, much lower.
Full must read report.